The Microscopic Bedrock of Science; thus the Scalpel of Medicine

The Microscopic Bedrock of Science; thus the Scalpel of Medicine

Denizens of the Net, I wish to impart a burden upon you all. Throughout my trials and tribulations in regards to my genealogy, I’ve come to the realization that the basis of DNA is a fabrication that was developed to impose artistic intention to co-opt critical thinking. The sheer surety in the tenants of DNA that teachers force fed into our minds is predicated on the amount of literature and printed material as a source of authority. 

Here’s a thought experiment; if the theories devised by Issac Newton or Albert Einstein were really mirrored and directly observable in day to day life, why are the books romanticizing the lives and circumstances of these Pillars of Science lacking in written accounts of the application of their theories. 

Take DNA as another subject for scrutiny. The double helical shape is supposed to be ubiquitous and it’s reading universal, yet there are no examples of life simple or complex that mirror that shape. It is mandated that DNA is packed into tight X-shaped structures called chromatin, yet there is no circulation or mechanism to expand chromatin in your body to “express” the information desired. Physical force on your body has no noticeable effect on your body. If you squeeze your body parts in different ways your X-chromosomes do not make you any more gendered. Think back to your old Science textbook. Each signature theory or experiment is depicted in illustrated figures. Proteins are simple blobs that are expected to make sense out of squiggles of DNA? 

What we have here is a simple observation. People have been trained for over a century to equate the simple pleasure of geometric artistry to give credence to it’s intentially misleading application to explaining the origins of life.

Medicine is called the practice of Science. I worked for many years as a Quality Control Scientist in several international pharmaceutical companies and the theories behind the “cures” these drug peddlers are straight from the dark ages. Many findings are based on the findings of rodents (mice, rats, shrews) sacrificed to perpetuate legitimacy. 

Adherents of Science will point to the cleanliness and the ability of their analysts to recreate the same “result” in their laboratories as proof that their theories of pathology are sound. The real world isn’t “clean”, and neither are we, the Patients. 

I find it abhorrent that we allow ourselves to be swabbed with alcohol to strip our skin of what it needs to cover and protect us from the hypodermic needles that serve to inject clear fluid or to take red blood away. 

Here’s a challenge for any pharmacological product housed in a vial: does it make your salad taste edible. Pharmaceuticals claim to spend millions on clean facilities that require Hazardous Material Suits, only to give you the only panacea they can offer: the relief of having what was extracted away from you (body fluids), returned in an injectable form (after rounds of incubation sous vide).

How can a single dose of a medicine have curative properties when the routine, nutrition, exercise, and interview of the Patient using the pill is not sought after? 

Try taking a pill right before exercise and one on a restful day to get your own thoughts on efficacy. 

What is the purpose of laws like HIPPA which serve to keep the ineffectiveness of medical intervention from the public in the name of confidentiality? 

Why are surgical procedures not recorded for your personal record? 

If you really cherish your body, you must know what was done to it while you were put unconscious.

If you treat your own senses as fine precision instrumentation, and your body as a personal laboratory, you transcend what is doctrine to gain the first sprout of independent thought.